A few months ago in the Beigh Area a friend and I undertook this whelming feet, and as an emotional aside I extracted a few nuggets and egoized hyper-moments last week to prove a point to another person about a statue he has made out of numbers and ideas and now it’s the most watched thing on cable TV. Take that, “Lena Dunham” (miss u). -K’k P.S. so sorry.
……………………………………………………….. Back or Hither. Into Remaining-ness. A series of titular events. What Is It.
As Always, I am paralytically interested in all feedback. So still i’ve no P.O. box, and am still learning how to automate those fill-in-the-blank forms in html, so in the interrim, please direct all correspondences electronically.
That is to say: if you saw me performing, please send your automatic narrative analyses, interpretations, diagrammatic engagements, etc. You can find some writing and theory around the show on the main website.
I am interested to explore other topographies, music video dialectix, sex-positive logos, garbage landscapes, post-graduate museum places.
So, thanks for taking pictures: i’m a hypocrite, and.
it’s been some time now. “with or without reason.”
WHEREAS, Languidly/Externally/Unsuitably/etc, Lxs Hu3rf(A)nos/pUT0s/Cr10s wandered from New York to New Orleans, through a multiplicity of Residencies, nicked T.A.N.G. (footage here) in St. P, and plunged from Miami into America LatIn, storming streets, bars, galleries and mus[ol]eums with a series of becomings, landlocked and outlawed, othered and spun. Below like mycelia are a series of representations and catalogs one might consult in pursuit of historiographies approaching wholity: *vintage*/ *feminine*/ personalized eastern / LINX
After one last five day Art Residency in the Fort-Lauderdale Airport, we landed on Other Earth, speaking Other Tongues. After Family, when April had passed her middle age we started southernly, to break ourselves upon our dash through nations. Again to Ipiales, Quito, Jungles.
In Peru (which is otherwise Ssswimminlgy) I somehow shed almost all of my digital limbs in a pastry shoppe when my little computer & ex-hard drive was snagged, and since then I’ve been a little left out in the cold from our contemporary MMORPG-style intellectual socius. Moments before the elopement, I had been dwelling around the creation of a project detailing Absence/Presence discourses in the context of a bodiless Web-Sphere, and have found that concept squarely punctuated by these past twenty weeks. Privilege as Math? Well.
Having passed Colombia’s familial strains, and the jungle tourists of Ecuador, we were through Peru’s solidarity and the eternal snaking desert who fed snakelike into pockmarked Chile and its snowy hospitality-po, and finally over the pass to rainbow mountains and Argentina, where we had been accepted to an art residency program in La Plata outside Buenos Aires.
Residencia Corazon offered a total inversion of the backpack’s physical limits. If there was a thesis or crowning center for my working body, it was my procedural construction and ambulation with this metaphor. Themes include: sisyphus, perspective weight, el mundo aparte, idiot-heroism, false artist gods…
In addition, we created a small menagerie of box worlds, diagrams, estatuetas, drawings and performance forumulae.
But last and most, we acquired the Horrible Tyrant, the Glorious One, the Patchwork Symbolist Messiah, Mugre. He was a nothing then, a furry trundle, messy on the street. And we snatched him. And we raised him. And we made him one of us.
[Hatefully, the Kickstarter I attempted to launch to cover the costs of the program was unaccountably quashed after weeks of silence. (here is the aborted kickstarter text) As a result, I will be happily if retroactively accepting commissions on a more personal level. Ah So!]
Returning north was a long hitch in hurting cold, more with a heady choosy puppy. But finally Bolivia opened to us. Swallowed us. And soon Peru had shat us out again into Florida, where racist NRA maniacs yell faggot at young people in torrential rain and leave them for dead on the highway. But at long last, with tears and laughter, trust identity crises, poly-monogamy, and a third leg, we have come back to the Northeast, separatists.
THEREFORE, We do want to investigate locomotive norms, travel literature as life fan fiction, and kitsch gypsyist nomad-colonialism; to hunt dogs through paradises; to examine Eternal Honeymooning rituals as a dualist problematic, a necessary musical tryst, eternal-return/death;
I want your film. I want your analyses. I want your dearth. I want the claws of your eyes.
…And when i say i am banal/kitsch/cliche/blase it is to beggar the sympathy of your advice, to broker evasion through the creation of new DNAs: the incorporation of new bodies, landscapes, metaphors, texts, movements, sounds, colors, gestures, personalities… so that in the future i will be more stringently demanding critique… and sure that this would dovetail squarely with the (excerpted from our Koala Haus Biennial Birthday Party) Abortion Open Discourse Around Once Upon A Time:
*{i am trying to perform a total generative misreading of all literature}*
They wanted me to be an honest hornet, an open bruise of myself spouted onto a literalist approach to living-it, and I slipped on my too-toady foot-becoming. That is to say, we tried to write a semi-comprehensile praxis analysis of the #OW(s) phenomenology in the WORLD, but we didn’t finish it, so that now it seems, fittingly, more of a half-festered corpse of itself (and hair pours onto my fingers from heaven). We did a lot of traveling. An approximate Dynamic Mapping is figured below.
Although actually, I think This is a better map. Not my map.
Huerfanos/Putos/Crios, one iterative limb of the Groupself Ensemble, will be performing around the city in the coming days and weeks as well – please contact one of us (Este can be found at A Wooden Idol) for booking arrangements.
(I wanted to open a dis-concourse around Representations of Self in the Media, but I guess I’ll do that later.)
***P.P.S. About Fauxtography… I’d relish that critique, just wanting of a shove. Please Ask***
I am now also a member of the group_self collectivity, and will be producing works with them. The collectivity is structurally mycelial and presents itself as “anti-arboreally emergent” on the internet. For now you should take a look at the following biological map and pseudo-charter statement below. If you’re interested in the project, please get in touch, and maybe we can figure out a further collaboration!
“groupself is a loose collaboration of mass speculation, a conceptual nomadic collectivity,a mystic pyramid scheme whose members form infinite rhizomatic tentacles of recombination-organelles.the architectural dna of the group spans through inter-media cannibal rituals and backwards, to otherwise illiterate critical theory chapbook encyclopaedias, transcending the space-time boundaries of our humble reality spheres. we disseminate wide ecologies and pedagogical possibilities onto the burgeoning cartographies of truth-scapes and their associated milieus; we are both recursively faery-tale and always-already epilogue to our own anti-narratives. we are an integrated animal that, develops, evolves, dies, rebirths, mutates, grows, regresses, progresses, and have collaborates with the “self” (inner outer) to become a nexus of cells, open arteries, and entangling alliances. we hope eventually to emancipate the body in order to enslave it once again.“
Long Thyme No C… hope lotsa posts coming soon. For now, also should be lots of forthcoming work on the now month-old T.A.N.G.!, a pseudo-capitalist collective offshoot of Dump.fm started by @LCKY & @maryrachel. I’ll be elaborating a bunch of bogus SoC theories on there over the next weeks. There’s contests too, seems like! So let me know about things you’d like to see extemporized, elaborated, or lengthened… ”What is E-Mail?” // “What is T.A.N.G.” // “ponies respond to elitist.”
It’s funny for me to keep delving further and further into worlds of digital art, even as a kind of ultimate metaphor rebuke against discourses of Reality-Authenticity-Spectacle.
Keep on lookin! Back in New York City very soon indeed.
Soon to scribe the uttered cliches, towards a cleverness or an intervention, the self against the self…of course, I want the things to be the Things Describing Themselves. [I am going to try to be as transparent and succinct as I know how to do. This is the best you're gonna get.]
Afterwards, when I hear the inevitable daily “OK, what does it Mean?” I usually first ask them what they think, and sometimes get to hear everybody’s exciting narratives of linearized plots, and then I tell them I’m interested in semiotic collaging, the rearranging of culturally meaning-charged objects, or of breaking down the mediums of social normal. “What are you doing?” is my most commonly asked question, and the one I am still least able to respond in kind to. That is to say, I can Begin, but I must begin by opening a smaller door. I want to reiterate as a prelude that this layer is exclusively concerned with structure and inherencies, and not content.
I have a little suitcase filled with puppets and things with a chalkboard on it and I wear little constumes and write and draw on the chalkboard and create little bio-machinistic scenes with the contents of the case and put it live to a kind of modal soundtrack as I move around.
Is it that I “Do” non-narrative performance puppet shows using a bricolage of garbage objects, broken dolls and animal parts to approximate the false semblance of a miniature novela? Do the little bodies who hang from my hands represent the impossible actions I can never approach, a mimicked reproduction of my own little activities, the Aboriginal Dreaming, a ritualed precaution against “art-criticism”, can their bodies point to my body, or the bodies of the audience? Instead of story, does it fall to mood-ing? Emotional suggestion or representation? It was recently levelled that the action was indeed the evocation of mood-telling, and that it ushered a strange ominous captivity over its space because of that. ”Is that Voodoo? Can you kill those three white people magic?” It is hard to remember that all writing must be neither exhaustive nor a litany of superficial possibilities.
The “Puppet Show” is a convenient medium because of its marginality and its precise situation. As a category with few well known examples, it proffers a great amplitude of form-al ambiguity and allows viewers to approach the play, hopefully, with something of a more tabula rasa mentality (if i said comparisons are odious i would be complicit with another kind of devil). But it is also a blurry estuarry between different genres: it is the crossroads of sculpture, music, theater, dance, and so-called performance-arts (and in my particular, poetry and literary analysis); it blurs the animate from the inanimate, the living from death, zones of control between manipulators and their subtle parasitic wards. A uses-puppets-show was going to be the pragmatic intermediary between zones of personal interaction – but now I also wonder whether I am questioning the location or extension of my own bodily tendrils, or cementing myself in a corporeal and anti-social prison. [???????]
Structured improvisation is like building a language, where I play until I find a phoneme of movement I can repeat and mix with others to creat words, phrases, sentences… also though, it is anti-linguistic, the robbery of that constructed stricture, an openness in silenct viscerality.
Every so often I get run out and chid with the caveat that the distribution of religious materials is the only acceptably similar practice on the premises to my behavior. And every new chance I reitterate my stance that my actions do of course constitute a valid religiousity. Can I only use “art is the new afterlife salvation”? Other misdeeds include the fascination of child-types, the distraction of worker-types, the re-indoctrination of greedy-types, etc…
Vocabularies of insinuation, between puppets, marionettes, titteres, maques, and small gods, activiate yet another background of reference and situation, and allude to the constant question of childishness, whether as a Play-ing, re-Covery/Lapsing (through visitation?), or Critique & Analysis.
It is true that I am very taken with ruptures, evocations of the uncanny and a speculation towards possibilities of entangled bodies-on/without/towards-bodies, that I want to exc[o/e]rcize a politic, and divorce contexts, but I am bidden also with an urgency to mislead and fabricate. I am struggling with how much truth to spin with lies now – am I better acting out the metaphor of my extended intuitions or mapping the Venn graphs of connectivity between my “Art” and “Life” who are layered and woven into strange relationship? Bitter as I am to admit. I want you hear your threaded possibilities, your discovered sewings around these collaborative theories.
(formless)
I've been wanting to Talk About This for a Long ...January 11th, 2013No comments
P.S. (puppet show) & Things
................................................................. Back or Hither. Into Remaining-ness. A series of titular ...July 31st, 2012No comments